RE: SARS-CoV-2?
Raion is actually pretty spot on with the US, we are very loyal to our home states, mostly have negative opinions of other states. Rarely leave our state unless we have to or there is change and we must adapt. I love my state (as it is now) with no current taxes for wealth, inheritance, death, precious bullion, or income. States have wildly different living standards, taxes and cost of living (you'd be shocked). High cost of living states tend to get thumbed (there are a few exceptions). That's mostly the east coast. Mid-westerners and westerners (like me) have a bad impression of the east coast (also California, even though it's on the west coast.)
I'm currently living in a 2-week city-wide mandatory self-isolation (if found outside without a good excuse you can be charged with a misdemeanor for defying the order!) in ground zero (first infected area reported in the US). But good for me, I work with an "essential" business so if I'm driving I can claim I'm operating for them. Though I respect the order generally and never normally leave my home without a reason anyway.
I wrote a huge document to post on this thread yesterday (so much to say). But that's all too much. Let me boil it down,
1. Since the US is not a socialized system, we think social programs are supposed to be medicine, to help you get better, then you're back on your feet and out of the program, not an addiction (life-long lifeline). America was formed with self-sustaining family farms. Even though most farms are gone, that message rings very true (you ask for help when you really need it, not when it's convenient. You should stand on your own and benefit from you own labor).
We have a terrible track record of life-long social programs and the taxation to pay for them kills the middle-class. We don't want more taxes because our cost of living (in my area) is extremely high, most people spend at least 75% or more of their paycheck on rent in my half of the state. The more you tax, the more new people need help and join the social programs (it's a bad cycle). I know in Europe everyone is on socialized programs because everyone pays in, which means you don't have a choice (no money pay for it yourself). Most middle-class and higher US citizens view social programs and those that use them them with pity. Because the truth if often there is no incentive to get off the programs, improve yourself, your situation, or change in any way. It’s basically considered free money by those that use it (not a helping hand) and often runs in families (once your parents are on it, you're likely to apply and be on it when you get old enough, and repeat the cycle).
That’s what we see when our politicians talk about social programs. Handing out free money to people how may or may not really need it or deserve it. I'm personally for helping those truly in need, who are humbled by their situation and want to work to get out of it. I also think we should heavily subsidize expensive medical procedures (e.g. major surgeries, $50,000 USD and above). That's what I think insurance should be only used for - catastrophic medical needs (not a doctor's check-up or sprained ankle).
2. In regards to the pandemic, did anyone here honestly think the government can do a darn thing about the spread? If the government had the power to control that much of the population and that fast…we would have seen it used in other instances before like natural disasters, riots, and such. The government has the rule of law to hide behind and tax-payer money. They don’t have magic wands or unlimited funds. This situation is really no different than people living 100+ years ago…it’s called the real world! It’s based on competition, health, death, winning, and betting. Vaccines take years to make, some people are more affected then others by different illnesses (owning to variations in people). Supplies are creates on demand, there aren't 500,000 ventilators in a warehouse somewhere waiting to be used, nor 50 million latex gloves just stacked up. Any government that put those things in place beforehand would have been ousted for wasting public money with that kind of stock-piling on a normal day in the past. We need roads repaired, and investment in other areas, not warehouses full of worst-cast scenario, doomsday, materials.
I don’t know what magic shield people have come to believe they now have, but the human body hasn’t changed, we are just as fragile and helpless when severally injured as we always were. Luck, genetics, diet, support systems (family, village, town, etc), and general overall health normally determined how long you naturally lived.
Sometimes it’s luck (good or bad) but life is generally the sum of your decisions from your starting point. A pandemic just shows, you have a public and personal responsibility to prevent infecting other people while trying to keep yourself safe (as much as possible). It’s a numbers game for sure, but you can increase your odds through your decision-making. How is this any different from older generations with TB, Polo, Influenza, Malaria, Cholera, etc? Maybe we've gone soft and had too many curable diseases, but real danger is out there, real risk, real consequences. Life isn't fair, everyone isn't equal. We are all different with different starting points and abilities (talents) in life. You play the hand you're dealt as best you can, no one can ask more than that of you.
Try to make good choices in life, think with your head, instead of other body parts. Be grateful and proud of your successes, learn from your mistakes, don’t give up, don’t stand still. It is, and always was, your responsibility to take care of yourself and your affairs, not the governments.
|