RE: Octane PM heatsink types
My brain chocks this up to just supplier and production run. SGI didn't make 1 million of each system. They had a dedicated production run for every PCB revision, I assume.
They sourced the parts they could, and you might expect there to be differences between generations of each production. At most a heatsink is a heatsink as long as it meets the basic requirements under testing. if your question is, could you swap the heatsinks and everyone would be OK, I would suggest no, but that could be for a myriad of reasons, including the thermal envelope of the processors, and any kind of adjusted tolerance between them.
Given the processes we're talking about I assume that they are more efficient not less efficient than the old models. Therefore, I would assume that having a heatsink with larger fins but center material means increased airflow but less heat saturation and thermal load.
Again, that's a guess. But I think there was a fair amount of time between these two processors being put out.
Even today, it's super common that you secure parts for a single production run. After that production run, you can go back to your suppliers and try to get the same parts but likely a certain percentage of them will no longer be available or you'll have to go with a different supplier for a similar part. This is just how our world works because nearly everything is done in short-term batches with a lot of stuff not being continuously run off a production line for years and time.
A lot of times semiconductors will be around for many many years but a lot of things like passive components, heatsinks, standoffs, screws, and bolts, etc will be sourced every production run.
(This post was last modified: 07-14-2023, 07:19 PM by weblacky.)
|
|
weblacky
I play an SGI Doctor, on daytime TV.
Trade Count:
(10)
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 88
Joined: Jan 2019
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
07-14-2023, 07:19 PM |