The Battle of the Trashcan Mac Pro's
#1
The Battle of the Trashcan Mac Pro's
I've started this thread as I'm going to be releasing a series of videos showing the various differences in performance between the Entry and Max Spec versions of the Mac Pro 6.1, as I now have very nice examples of both of these machines.

This is my first video showing the Multi Core CPU performance difference between these two machines:

Irinikus
Hardware Connoisseur

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 3,475
Threads: 319
Joined: Dec 2017
Location: South Africa
Website Find Reply
06-29-2024, 04:18 PM
#2
RE: The Battle of the Trashcan Mac Pro's
Irinikus
Hardware Connoisseur

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 3,475
Threads: 319
Joined: Dec 2017
Location: South Africa
Website Find Reply
06-30-2024, 02:44 PM
#3
RE: The Battle of the Trashcan Mac Pro's
I was considering migrating my FreeBSD fleet to trashcans but the rack mount kits are so expensive.

I ended up getting a bunch of dells and modding them with noctuas. I 3D-printed brackets and installed a bunch of exhaust fans (basically doubling the number of fans), and they are running nicely, eating 50W each at load.

And my classic Mac Pro has 4 nvmes (via sonnet card), so I can't justify the change either. So, well, I save money!
Shiunbird
Administrator

Trade Count: (1)
Posts: 553
Threads: 45
Joined: Mar 2021
Location: Czech Republic
Find Reply
07-01-2024, 12:41 PM
#4
RE: The Battle of the Trashcan Mac Pro's
Irinikus
Hardware Connoisseur

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 3,475
Threads: 319
Joined: Dec 2017
Location: South Africa
Website Find Reply
07-02-2024, 05:43 PM
#5
RE: The Battle of the Trashcan Mac Pro's
At this time I'm unfortunately not able to compare the GPU compute performance between the two Trashcans's, as firstly Blender 4.2 won't install on Mac OS Catalina, although I was able to get Blender 4.0.2 to install it requires Mac Os 12.3 in order to enable GPU rendering in the Cycles Render Engine!!!

I was however able to run Cycles with CPU rendering in Blender 4.0.2 and got the following result:

[Image: PMZ7elP.jpg]

The D300's on the Entry Level machine are significantly faster!

I did compare the Heaven Benchmark performance between the two machines and got the following results:

[Image: WtvTzmO.jpg]

[Image: BlGHEgX.jpg]

According to this result, the D700's aren't significantly more powerful than the D300's, they just have 3 times the video RAM!
However, it would have been interesting to see if the difference is the same when it comes to GPU Compute with both D700's enabled?

[Image: Bvu52Yl.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 07-03-2024, 04:47 PM by Irinikus.)
Irinikus
Hardware Connoisseur

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 3,475
Threads: 319
Joined: Dec 2017
Location: South Africa
Website Find Reply
07-03-2024, 04:46 PM
#6
RE: The Battle of the Trashcan Mac Pro's
You inspired me to do some testing.
I couldn't get GPU in Cycles enabled in macos, but it works fine in Windows.

I got a cMP with dual x5675 (2x 6 cores @ 3.06) and a Vega 64.
The 3.3 Blender splash screen demo scene renders in 27 minutes on the CPUs and 7 minutes on the Vega 64 under the newest Blender in Windows 10.

edit: enabling both CPUs and GPUs raises the time to 11 minutes.
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2024, 03:48 PM by Shiunbird.)
Shiunbird
Administrator

Trade Count: (1)
Posts: 553
Threads: 45
Joined: Mar 2021
Location: Czech Republic
Find Reply
07-04-2024, 03:48 PM
#7
RE: The Battle of the Trashcan Mac Pro's
(07-04-2024, 03:48 PM)Shiunbird Wrote:  You inspired me to do some testing.
I couldn't get GPU in Cycles enabled in macos, but it works fine in Windows.

I got a cMP with dual x5675 (2x 6 cores @ 3.06) and a Vega 64.
The 3.3 Blender splash screen demo scene renders in 27 minutes on the CPUs and 7 minutes on the Vega 64 under the newest Blender in Windows 10.

edit: enabling both CPUs and GPUs raises the time to 11 minutes.

Cool!  Cool
I have a solution to get Monterey running on the 12 Core machine! I’ll install Monterey onto one of these and select it as the startup disk when I want to run Monterey!
[Image: fvqIAHr.jpg]

The 4TB OWC SSD’s absolutely staying in the machine, as it’s an extremely rare item and thus more valuable than the machine itself!
Irinikus
Hardware Connoisseur

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 3,475
Threads: 319
Joined: Dec 2017
Location: South Africa
Website Find Reply
07-04-2024, 04:33 PM


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)