1600SW slows down O2 compared to using VGA
#1
1600SW slows down O2 compared to using VGA
Never noticed this before as I have always used the SGI1600sw monitor with my O2.  But last night I plugged in a 19" Sony FP monitor to compare the screen brightness and notices an increase of speed when IRIX loads the desktop.  Opening and closing apps seems a bit faster.  Overall the system seems less sluggish.  The resolution im running on the Sony through the VGA port is 1280x1024 32x32 bit.  I understand with the UMA memory the higher resolution of the 1600sw may be using more ram than the lower res monitor.  I just didnt think it would be that noticeable.

Octane 2x600mhz R14000 Octane2 dual head V12 / V10, 7 gig Ram
Octane 2x250mhz R10000 2gig ram, MXE, Digital Video, MSCSI, Jaleo
1600SW O2 400mhz R12000 O2, 1gig Ram AV1  - 250gig Media' raid
Indy 180mhz R5000 Indy XZ 256mb ram
Indigo2 200mhz R4400 Extreme…….Under Construction
Dell T7600 dual 3.5 Xeon, 512 gb ram, Quadro K6000 + Tesla k20 - DaVinci Resolve Studio Editing
Dell T5500 dual 3.2 Xeon, 72gb ram, Quadro 6000 + Tesla C2075 - DaVinci Resolve Studio Cutting
Intel i7-990x 3.46GHz Extreme 6 core / Quadro 5000 & 2 x Tesla C2075 / 24gig Ram inside an SGI 320vw case
bjames
Tezro

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 384
Threads: 109
Joined: Aug 2018
Find Reply
04-16-2019, 02:44 PM
#2
RE: 1600SW slows down O2 compared to using VGA
Hi, yes it's quite noticeable. I suppose it's pushing data for 327,680 more pixels at 32x32 depth so quite an ask for a machine which shares it bandwidth as the O2 does. The CRM -> Display Engine bandwidth size has a direct impact on the remaining available bandwidth for the rest of the system.

Ian did some tests a while ago for something and found the O2 sped up the lower the resolution was (or slowed down with higher resolutions, take it how you want Smile ). You could increase the O2's performance by about 13% he found if you're willing to go to 640x480X16 Smile

Ref Ian's page

http://sgidepot.co.uk/o2arch.html

edit - My O2 now runs at 1440x900 on my 24" Dell with a custom vfo, so the aspect ratio of 16:10 is spot on. This resolution also uses less bandwidth that the standard 1280x1024.

No longer active. Please do not contact me.
(This post was last modified: 04-16-2019, 04:40 PM by Jacques.)
Jacques
Tezro

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 565
Threads: 53
Joined: May 2018
Location: UK
Find Reply
04-16-2019, 04:38 PM
#3
RE: 1600SW slows down O2 compared to using VGA
So its not just my imagination then.. I wonder if anyone has been able to create a custom VFO for the 1600SW to drop the resolution slightly. Its a great monitor, but I constantly have a problem with everything being so small to read.

Octane 2x600mhz R14000 Octane2 dual head V12 / V10, 7 gig Ram
Octane 2x250mhz R10000 2gig ram, MXE, Digital Video, MSCSI, Jaleo
1600SW O2 400mhz R12000 O2, 1gig Ram AV1  - 250gig Media' raid
Indy 180mhz R5000 Indy XZ 256mb ram
Indigo2 200mhz R4400 Extreme…….Under Construction
Dell T7600 dual 3.5 Xeon, 512 gb ram, Quadro K6000 + Tesla k20 - DaVinci Resolve Studio Editing
Dell T5500 dual 3.2 Xeon, 72gb ram, Quadro 6000 + Tesla C2075 - DaVinci Resolve Studio Cutting
Intel i7-990x 3.46GHz Extreme 6 core / Quadro 5000 & 2 x Tesla C2075 / 24gig Ram inside an SGI 320vw case
bjames
Tezro

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 384
Threads: 109
Joined: Aug 2018
Find Reply
04-16-2019, 05:43 PM
#4
RE: 1600SW slows down O2 compared to using VGA
I've never seen a 1600SW run at anything other than 1600x1024...I'm not sure it can run at anything other than the native resolution?

No longer active. Please do not contact me.
Jacques
Tezro

Trade Count: (0)
Posts: 565
Threads: 53
Joined: May 2018
Location: UK
Find Reply
04-16-2019, 07:39 PM


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)