I really love the 1600sw for the industrial design, look and performance as there is nothing else out their that comes close. BUT…. From a user perspective (my experience) I can’t stand working with it. From a usability standpoint point I fond the text to be too small. I understand the marketing that the 17.3 super wide has more pixels than a 20” crt, but with the higher resolution I find I need to use reading glasses to comfortably view the screen.
With that said I almost prefer an 18” lcd 1280x1024 monitor as it is just a crisp but much more comfortable to the eyes.
So I’m always torn, when I display/mess around with the SGI system of the year, I prefer the 1600sw for authentic and sentimental completeness, but rather use a f181 for user comfort.
I also notice a slight bump in display interactivity using the 18” probably due to lower resolution.
Curious what others think about the 1600sw or your “monitor dilemmas”

2x600mhz R14000 Octane2 dual head V12 / V10, 7 gig Ram

2x250mhz R10000 2gig ram, MXE, Digital Video, MSCSI, Jaleo

400mhz R12000 O2, 1gig Ram AV1 - 250gig Media' raid

180mhz R5000 Indy XZ 256mb ram

200mhz R4400 Extreme…….Under Construction
Dell T7600 dual 3.5 Xeon, 512 gb ram, Quadro K6000 + Tesla k20 - DaVinci Resolve Studio Editing
Dell T5500 dual 3.2 Xeon, 72gb ram, Quadro 6000 + Tesla C2075 - DaVinci Resolve Studio Cutting
Intel i7-990x 3.46GHz Extreme 6 core / Quadro 5000 & 2 x Tesla C2075 / 24gig Ram inside an SGI 320vw case